In-Context Learning
Standard Univariate results available

TiCT

A synthetically pretrained time series in-context classifier with scalable label encoding.

Using TiCT for time series classification

A synthetically pretrained time series in-context classifier with scalable label encoding.

In this benchmark, TiCT is evaluated using training-free in-context classification. Checkpoint information: No standalone checkpoint link found. Check the results below for the settings and dataset scopes with published scores.

Evaluated configurations

Native in-context inference

Classifier heads are grouped under their shared pretrained model here. They remain separate leaderboard entries because they are different experimental configurations.

Organization
Visa Research
Parameters
47M (TiCT-Large, ResNet)
Checkpoint used
No standalone checkpoint link found
Input Type
Univariate time series
Inference
Training-free in-context classification

TiCT classification benchmark results

Compare accuracy and average rank only within the same evaluation setting and dataset scope. Standard uses the official training splits; 5-shot and 10-shot use different budget-feasible subsets. Rank and average rank include other models in the full comparison set. Scores are not averaged across configurations.

For comparisons with other backbones, open the foundation model classification leaderboard and use the same setting and scope. The few-shot evaluation protocol explains the label budgets.

Standard · Univariate

Comparison set: 19 configurations

This Standard time series classification comparison reports 1 TiCT configuration for the univariate dataset scope. Each row shows its own coverage.

The highest reported average accuracy among this model's configurations in this setting is 79.17%, reported by TiCT with coverage 128 / 128. This configuration ranks 4 of 19 in this comparison set. The result describes this configuration and setting, rather than every possible use of the pretrained model.

TiCT — Standard Univariate time series classification benchmark results
ConfigurationUnivariate RankUnivariate Accuracy (%)Avg. RankCoverage
TiCT479.176.68128 / 128

TiCT paper, code and checkpoint

Reading this model's evaluation

The method catalog describes the pretrained model; leaderboard eligibility depends on the actual coverage of each experimental configuration. Catalog inclusion does not imply complete coverage of all 198 datasets.